Talk:Dorian Awards
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dorian Awards article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Subject
[edit]The article at AfC was entirely about the Dorian Awards (including all the 2012 winners), rather than GaLECA, so I've named the article as the former. Sionk (talk) 21:58, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dorian Awards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170118051937/http://galeca.org/winners.html to http://galeca.org/winners.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:06, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
Additional citations for verification added
[edit]I have removed information that cannot currently be verified, and added citations to other descriptions of this organization's endeavors and history. The group's website has been used as a reference in a few cases (pertaining to its number of members, for example). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blurbadeeblurb (talk • contribs) 01:05, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Bolding in awards tables
[edit]@Blurbadeeblurb:, firstly, thank you for doing such a great job here! I am concerned about the bolding of items in the awards tables, I think it’s manual of style and/or accessibility issues that say not to do it. If you’d like help changing them over I have Visual Editor which makes it pretty easy. Let me know what you think. Gleeanon409 (talk) 12:16, 7 January 2020 (UTC) RESPONSE: Hi, ! Thanks for the compliment Gleeanon409, but it's actually a village at work here. :) I didn't format the awards tables, so I defer to the Wiki experts who know best standards for copy. If you think it needs changing, I have no issues with that - but I'd be afraid to touch the tables because I'm a relative novice here and don't want to mess things up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blurbadeeblurb (talk • contribs) 08:18, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- Start-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/19 February 2013
- Accepted AfC submissions
- Start-Class film articles
- Start-Class film awards articles
- Film awards task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- Start-Class awards articles
- Unknown-importance awards articles
- Awards articles
- Articles with connected contributors