Talk:Doug Inglish

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

CorenSearchBot Follow-Up

I removed the information that was directly from Doug Inglish's personal biography on his website, but I left his client list as it is also cited from links other than his website. --PhotoFan76 (talk) 15:59, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. -- — CactusWriter | ^needles 23:38, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest, notability?

This is one of several dozen articles created by this person’s agent. (It was not necessarily done with their knowledge.) It should be reviewed for notability, conflict of interest and neutral language. For more details, see:

MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist#trunkarchive.com (permanent link)

—A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:41, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's questionable, but wikipedia editors are notoriously uneven about this issue of notability. You find nearly every porn star has a wikipedia page, but accomplished authors and scientists and artists routinely fall victim to deletionist editors (you get a lot more rewards with editing perks and powers from thousands of mindless edits like that than anyone has done by actually contributing information to articles or writing new articles). DonPMitchell (talk) 23:39, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]