Talk:Dread (forum)

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Websites: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

"Hugbunter" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hugbunter. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:14, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Suitable citations for new Onion URL

Paging User:Rhododendrites, what is an acceptable citation for the current v3 Onion URL (dreadytofatroptsdj6io7l3xptbet6onoyno2yv7jicoxknyazubrad.onion)? Is it accepted that 0x6133ACE1F4B87C51DBF3FEA5E8610510F9A6E922 is the fingerprint of HugBunter's PGP key, that the key is uncompromised, and thus a message which is signed by that key will suffice? Are resources such as dark.fail accepted? Similarly, is a citation needed to mark the v2 address (dreadditevelidot.onion) as defunct? It is clear to see that it no longer works. — JivanP (talk) 05:50, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@JivanP: Because of how messy onion urls can be, and the great potential cost to the reader of going to the wrong one, Wikipedia tends to want a reliable source to back up the address and to err on the side of exclusion otherwise. So like Silk Road (marketplace) cites a book and Business Insider. The current Dread url is from The Register. DeepDotWeb was one source (though a kind of controversial one -- no clear consensus about its reliability) but, well, that's gone. I don't know anything about dark.fail. It doesn't look to have a lot of information about it or the kinds of things we'd look for when assessing WP:RS. @Deku-shrub: you know of it? — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 14:30, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think dark.fail or Darknet live would have to be built with sources showing itself they arer eliable so that can be cited. Otherwise there's no google news hits on the new url so nothing easy to cite to high standards Deku-shrub (talk) 13:21, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Deku-shrub: what is the stance on PGP-signed messages as primary sources? — JivanP (talk) 07:54, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be supported as is. The idea is that the Wikipedia reader shouldn't have to do such validation of their sources. If another reliable source has done so however, that source can be used Deku-shrub (talk) 15:39, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Onion Link

Why is the onion link not allowed as an "External Links" section? Other wikis allow it. How is this different? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.126.241.101 (talk) 17:56, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]