Jump to content

Talk:Drillship Seacrest

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikipedia Ambassador Program assignment

[edit]

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at California Maritime Academy supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.

Above message substituted from {{WAP assignment}} on 14:22, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Peer Review

[edit]

1. This article doesn't seem to have 1,000 words. I would make this the number one issue when approaching to edit your page. The lead paragraph seems good, but might be able to split into two since there is so much info provided. Lead sections are used to draw viewers in, not scare with too much. We are missing 4 total sections, though, and the amount of citations. We could use some images, too.

2. Sources seem like they're pretty official and sufficient for Wiki. References are not recorded correctly, but that's an easy fix. This is very necessary though to make wikipedia a credible source, which is our reason to be in this class. I feel these authors used worth while articles to retrieve their info from.

3. Info is factual, not bias, but could use some work on flow. Make it easier for viewers to follow. Overall, some content is missing, but some format fixing and a little more info will make this page solid!

Thill593 (talk) 15:29, 11 April 2012 (UTC)Tyler Hill[reply]


Completeness:

   500 words per person: No
   Lead Paragraph: Yes
   4 Sections of content: No
   Minimum ammount of citations:5
   Images: None

Evaluation of Resources:

   Are the sources listed in the References of sufficient authority? Yes
   Are the sources listed in the References of accurate? Yes
   Conduct searches of the topic yourself. Do you feel like the authors found worth while articles or just easily available articles? Yes

Readability & Content:

   Is the information being presented factual in nature? Yes
   Is the information being presented objective? (No Bias) Yes
   Does the article flow effectively? Yes
   Does the article feeling like it is missing content? No

In general its nice, but if you can get a picture and section it out, you should be fine.

Dmitry Borovkov