Talk:Duane Clarridge

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Espionage Low‑importance

	Duane Clarridge is within the scope of WikiProject Espionage, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of espionage, intelligence, and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.EspionageWikipedia:WikiProject EspionageTemplate:WikiProject EspionageEspionage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: New Hampshire Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	New Hampshire portal This article is supported by WikiProject New Hampshire (assessed as Low-importance).

Refimprove

The refimprove tag was added without explanation, and most sections seem generally well sourced. There are exceptions, however. I think it would be more appropriate to add the tag to a specific section or citation needed tags to specific statements. I wanted to give people a chance to object before I removed the template and replaced it with more specific tags. In general, I think specific tags are better because it's easier for other people to quickly fix the problem - which I don't think applies to the entire article. Input? Objections? Alternate suggestions? TheMikeBest (talk) 14:35, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I also added citations for the two big paragraphs, the quote and the date of death that didn't have them, but again I don't want to remove a tag that was just added. The fact that I don't see the problem doesn't mean there isn't one. TheMikeBest (talk) 14:39, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Now irrelevant, tag was removed by the user that first added it. TheMikeBest (talk) 16:33, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Duane Clarridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110321003426/http://www.salon.com:80/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2011/03/17/clarridge/index.html to http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2011/03/17/clarridge/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:55, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]