Talk:Duluth model

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Feminism (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

"Male" as a noun[edit]

Please stop using "male" as a noun. It is to be used in reference to male animals, and is offensive when used in reference to humans.

"Male" as a noun[edit]

Please continue using "male" as a noun. It is to be used in reference to male animals, such as humans, and is not offensive when used in reference to humans unless you are incredibly easily offended or looking to profit from a pretended offense. Male is a term that covers half of humanity, men and boys. I see no dictionary definition that claims it is some sort of insult. And I see Feminists refer to females without any outcry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.200.204.35 (talk) 10:44, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

I don't see "male" used as a noun in the article at all, so what is this all about? BTW, IMO, male is the correct term when talking about both boys and men, but should not be used when talking only about men. Aapjes (talk) 10:46, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

I just want to share my suspicion that the original comment was a parody of something contemporaneous like this: https://www.buzzfeed.com/tracyclayton/stop-calling-women-females Im not afraid (talk) 18:40, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

NPOV[edit]

The in response section is extremely biased and not written with a NPOV. Michael H 34 (talk) 14:57, 28 January 2009 (UTC) Michael H 34

Article does not describe the Duluth model[edit]

This article, despite being almost a page long, completely fails at the basic task of an encyclopedia: Properly describing the subject.

All we get is one sentence: "This experimental program, conducted in Duluth, Minnesota in 1981, coordinated the actions of a variety of agencies dealing with domestic conflict". We also learn that it "is based on a "violence is patriarchal" model".

This is not nearly enough. What does the Duluth model actually do? How would I notice the Duluth model being implemented? Who would act differently if the Duluth model was implemented?

As a reader who did not know the Duluth model before visiting this page, I feel that I learned nothing. --Xeeron (talk) 15:58, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

I came here to say the same thing. This page never actually describes the Duluth model or what it is. Srnec (talk) 16:09, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
I tried to make it clearer Aapjes (talk) 11:10, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Added an implementation section to help alleviate this problem. I don't know enough about the practical implications of a legal system which follows the Duluth model however the fact that I cannot find such information on this page shows that such a section is required. 71.246.206.64 (talk) 04:24, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Multiple references to one newspaper article[edit]

And no reference to the actual studies that article refers to. Has no-one managed to *find* these studies? jae (talk) 10:20, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Duluth model. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:23, 17 December 2016 (UTC)