Talk:Egyptian Theatre (DeKalb, Illinois)

Egyptian Theatre (DeKalb, Illinois) was one of the Art and architecture good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 11, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
December 1, 2009	Good article reassessment	Delisted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 11, 2006.

Current status: Delisted good article

Illinois High‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Theatre Low‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Paranormal

	This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Six?

The theater is one of only six what remaining in the US? Theaters? Egyptian Theaters? --Dmz5*Edits**Talk* 05:13, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thought it was obvious because of the previous sentence and the context, but I added the word Egyptian anyway. I mean six theatres in the US, come on now. Happy Editing.A mcmurray 02:59, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Haha I know it didn't mean there are only 6 theatres, but that is exactly what it appeared to mean. It could also have been referring to an intervening sentence that had since been cut out (like, about it having a unique organ or something.)--Dmz5*Edits**Talk* 17:24, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Egyptian Theatre, Coos Bay, Oregon, 1925. Is the 7th. should it read "...it is believed to be only one of a few remaining in the United States"?12.145.73.51 18:59, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I like that wording much better.A mcmurray 19:22, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tone

Where are the problems, as I will happily fix them.A mcmurray 03:49, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone? Bueller? What are the tone problems? This article didn't seem that informal to me. Anyone?A mcmurray 16:56, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, there doesn't really seem to be a big tone problem, I removed the tag.-Dmz5*Edits**Talk* 05:01, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Pass

I'm passing the article after editing the flow a little in the lead paragraph. It seems to me to have all the essentials - good citing, reasonable coverage, decent grammar and structure, stability, and NPOV. The pictures are also quite nice. Ideas for improvement would be (perhaps) doing something about the architect's red-link or finding something else notable for a new section. --Meowist 06:55, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]