This article is within the scope of the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dungeons & Dragons-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, or join the discussion, where you can join the project and find out how to help!
Needs to be merged with high elf, since the PHB 4e even says they are also called high elves.--188.8.131.52 (talk) 19:01, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Not a merge, but a disambig. page if there's ever enough details on the 4e "eladrin" to give then a page of their own. The 2e/3e/3.5e Eladrin are completely distinct from the 4e "eladrin". Beyond a shared name, it's sketchy. If anything, right now the 4e versions deserve a mention on the elf page, or a minor mention here on the Eladrin page.Shemeska (talk) 00:48, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Yes, absolutely. Recentism is to be avoided, and history needs to be preserved. It should be stated how eladrin were used in 2E/3E, and how they differ in 4E - do not replace the old information with the new. I have been actively trying to stem the tide of 4E-recentism - see my user page. BOZ (talk) 15:17, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
I have added a publication history section to this article, as per my current project. Hopefully this will keep things in perspective. I removed the references to the 3E Monster Manual II and Planar Handbook, as I don't see where the eladrin were referenced there; if you know where these references occured, please feel free to restore them in an appropriate manner. :) BOZ (talk) 14:22, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Favonian (talk) 11:34, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Why? Is there a use of the term "eladrin" that isn't related to Dungeons & Dragons? 184.108.40.206 (talk) 14:37, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
Oppose no need for disambiguation when the original name is unique on wikipedia. MilborneOne (talk) 18:03, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
Oppose another unnecessary disambiguation. —Torchiesttalkedits 16:50, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.