Talk:Elaine Scarry

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Untitled[edit]

Another orphaned philosophy article, which, if she is really important, should have been linked to the page on Pain. However, there's just not enough of substance here about what she really says for that to make sense.--Levalley (talk) 22:54, 31 March 2009 (UTC)LeValley

I certainly agree with Levalley above. Scarry's "Body in Pain" is profound, seminal, highly influential. This Wikipedia entry is ghastly, just dreadful. Clearly, Harvard's marketing dept isn't wasting that juggarnaut endowment on Wikipedia entries; and Elaine Scarry obviously doesn't have a marketeer or government agent on her payroll--Quite the opposite, she seems to be badgered here by some engineer troll who's mad at her for pursuing a journalistic investigation of electronic impulses at one point. This Wikipedia entry is a shame, and one of the stark examples of how contributions in a lower-profit aspect of our economy, the Arts and philosophy, don't make it into public knowledge but instead live in the community of scholars, diffusing quietly from there. I guess that now that we don't have to compete with communism, the FBI isn't funding the popular promotion of high-level cultural production anymore. We're on our own now, kids. Scarry has contributed importantly to advancing Western thought in our time. Read "The body in pain". If it doesn't blow you away, you're dead inside. Blanche Poubelle (talk) 03:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Elaine Scarry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:27, 21 December 2016 (UTC)