Talk:Elysian Shadows

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Delete and Salt, July 15 2014, see discussion.
delete, May 30 2014, see discussion.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Jackpot World (1 participant)
Bejeweled Stars (5 participants)
Melee (game terminology) (5 participants)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (13 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Planned features

I tagged the "Planned features" list as unsourced and advertisement/buzzword-heavy crystal-ball material. While I doubt this will end up as vaporware, we need to be careful about highlighting shiny features of an unreleased game, especially when it's unsourced. Even if sources appear, we should pare it back to what reliable, third-party sources consider its key features. I don't have much time to look through sources now, but I wanted to leave a note to avoid it seeming like drive-by tagging. If I can't find sources after a few days, I'll remove the section. Woodroar (talk) 02:23, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is a primary source but it is also the Kickstarter video for the game and it shows all the features in action.--Cube b3 (talk) 04:28, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fhy9Rd9KNdc

Not only is it a primary source, but it's a sales-oriented primary source, and will inherently be "unduly self-serving" in showcasing the product's selling points. It's not that I don't believe the features exist, but we need a reliable, third-party source to tell us which of them are important. Woodroar (talk) 05:47, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You can go ahead and use the Kotaku reference for that then as they have all reported on it.

http://kotaku.com/a-16-bit-rpg-that-promises-a-modern-twist-1626228329 --209.184.116.196 (talk) 00:35, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Story section

The Story section is just ripped from the game's website: http://www.elysianshadows.com/game/information/

Opinions? Should it be re-written? Should it be replaced with blockquote? Not going to re-write myself (at least not now) but figured I'd point it out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Youngsaucin (talk • contribs) 10:43, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

should this be deleted?

The game is never coming out and the creator took the money and ran. he ignores any inquiries about the game and by all accounts it's considered a scam. I don't think it deserves a Wikipedia page. 145.40.173.69 (talk) 03:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel that way nominate for deletion but make sure you have sources for your clams Nbisbo (talk) 06:03, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]