Talk:Endometrium

Anatomy: Microanatomy Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to microanatomy.

Women's Health Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Edits

I changed "21-13 days" to "12-13 days" since I assumed it was a typo. / Habj 21:25, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I partly rewrote the center section and introduced the terms proliferative, secretory, and menstrual endometrium, as these are important to understand the process. I removed part of the discussion about cycle length in dogs and horses as that belongs to the estrous cycle and is not germane to the endometrium itself. The discussion about the horse cycle was transferred to the estrous cycle. Ekem 22:21, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The introduction of those terms are great but I think they should be explained a little more. // Habj 18:00, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

That's a great picture, and indeed I can see that the authors may have spent great efforts in order to produce it and gracefully illustrate us about how Mother Nature really works. But we common pet lovers might find it somewhat displeasant to watch. I myself had a reaction of shock when I first opened the page: for a brief moment I thought it was an human embryo! (and I know you doctors keep those kind of pictures!) In a second I looked desperately for the caption and I was informed it was from a cat. I breathed with relief and thanked the unknown medical editor for the consideration, but the following second I started to remember my long-ago gone Ralf pet cat. Would it be too much to ask if, for a chance, don't you have some picture from a cow or pork or some other mammal that we are more accustomed to slice and eat? Believe me, many people turn to Wikipedia exactly because their mood isn't like they would want to attend medical school, with all its corpse dissections and the like. Thank you and please forgive our sensitiveness! Aldo L (talk) 21:11, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Endometrium vs, endometrial lining

Are the terms "endometrium" and "endometrial lining" synonymous? This needs to be clarified. If they're different, then the term "endometrial lining" needs to be defined. ThreeOfCups (talk) 01:17, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

They are synonymous, judging by what I have read and studied over the years, as is "uterine lining." Flyer22 (talk) 16:19, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Endometrium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061205114451/http://medlib.med.utah.edu/WebPath/FEMHTML/FEM017.html to http://medlib.med.utah.edu/WebPath/FEMHTML/FEM017.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:21, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]