Talk:Erin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Male name[edit]

An anonymous editor claims that the name is unisex. Wiktionary claims exclusively female. Does anyone know of any male Erin? Dbfirs 19:01, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(later) Google seems to agree that Erin can be a female or a male name. Dbfirs 19:33, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hi i'm erin and i'm a guy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.116.128.105 (talk) 23:13, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Its unisex http://www.babynameguide.com/categoryunisex.asp?strGender=&strAlpha=E&strCat=Unisex&strOrder=Name —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.137.4.37 (talk) 02:12, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

erin the name is totally cool —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.236.118.139 (talk) 00:42, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits about male version in India are presumably from a different derivation of the name, and would therefore presumably be a different article, and a hatnote would be carried from this article to that article. Additions to this article should be referenced appropriately, not with anecdotal comment. billinghurst sDrewth 06:54, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Singular[edit]

"Eirinn" is said to be dative. It is also singular, but because of its meaning, it is hardly ever used in the plural. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.137.170.8 (talk) 12:41, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A bit like Germany - but before the Reunification there was briefly talk of the two Germanies in the British Press (mostly, I suspect, so the broadsheets could broadside the red tops over the spelling). I don't suppose the Irish Gaelic Press ever refers to the two Irelands (i.e., Northern and the ROI)?
Nuttyskin (talk) 16:24, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If they did, it would still be in the singular and probably in the dative, as Irish traditionally used the dative singular after the number two, although in the modern standard the nominative singular is usual. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.111.22.26 (talk) 14:53, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Added PENDING CHANGES[edit]

Due to the persistent and usually unhelpful edits by IP addresses, I have added this page into the trial of pending changes. billinghurst sDrewth 15:19, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Erin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:53, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Erin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:04, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Erin in the work of William Blake[edit]

Why is there no mention of the character of Erin in the work of William Blake? See, for example, the entry in the Blake Dictionary by Foster Damon. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=BInf0BiZolgC&printsec=frontcover&dq=blake+dictionary&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=erin&f=false 109.151.72.27 (talk) 15:21, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm personally not sure what change you are proposing to make to this article (or what mention you propose to make and where). However, I would note that Erin (personification) is probably a better place to discuss the use (by any artist or any writer) of Erin as a personification of Ireland. This article is primarily about the name/word itself. And its derivation/history/etc. Use of the name/work, as a personification of Ireland, is covered elsewhere. (In the same way that the Hibernia and Hibernia (personification) articles are separated. Or the Liberty and Liberty (personification) or Hispania and Hispania (personification) articles are distinct. If you're therefore planning on adding content about Blake's use of Erin as a personification/representation of something, then perhaps it isn't here because it's not really the place for it... Guliolopez (talk) 15:35, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]