Talk:Ethnic groups in London

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

London Mid‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

2001 sources

While repairing vandalism and updating a link, I found the figures given for the 2001 census didn't quite match the source [http://legacy.london.gov.uk/gla/publications/factsandfigures/dmag-briefing-2003-23.pdf 2001 Census: Ethnic groups in London and other districts]. They were only trivial differences: White British in the source is 59.79% but was shown here as 59.6%, Other White 8.29% but shown here as 8.4%. The old figures match those in ONS Population Estimates by Ethnic Group, 2001 to 2005. Should we switch to using and citing the second source? NebY (talk) 13:04, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

300,000 Russians in London?

I'm surprised the article currently suggests there are 300,000 Russians resident in London (~4% of the population) and are seemingly the largest ethnic grouping. However, the source used for this number (http://www.iomlondon.org/doc/mapping/IOM_RUSSIA.pdf) actually says "Unofficial estimates suggest that approximately 300,000 Russians, or those who consider themselves as such, currently call Britain their home... The numbers are, however, highly speculative and have not been formally confirmed by any authority, including the Home Office." (emphasis added). While there are undoubtedly many Russians living in London, I very much doubt they outnumber (for example) the Irish 2 to 1. Then again, maybe I'm comparing the figures from the 2001 census with more recent figures from 2007. So, sould we really be using "unofficial estimates" alongside official census data?

I also think the other numbers listed in the "Other large groups" section are worth re-examining. Astronaut (talk) 13:39, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately this is fairly typical of ethnic group articles on Wikipedia. Some editors' approach seems to be to find the largest estimate possible and then add that without any consideration of whether it is accurate. Cordless Larry (talk) 13:55, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ethnic groups in London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110511105031/http://www.iomlondon.org/doc/mapping/IOM_JAMAICA.pdf to http://www.iomlondon.org/doc/mapping/IOM_JAMAICA.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:11, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ethnic groups in London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090829103708/http://trustedplaces.com:80/places/uk/london/palmers+green to http://trustedplaces.com/places/uk/london/palmers+green

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:59, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ethnic groups in London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081026222548/http://www.yell.com/find/DoFindLocations/lo/UK+London+Palmers-Green to http://www.yell.com/find/DoFindLocations/lo/uk+London+Palmers-Green

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:22, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced changes

@Southlondoneye: looks like you updated some stats in this article without providing a reference for the change. The reference "EthnicPop2021" isn't defined and produces a referencing error. I see that "EthnicPop2011" still exists in the article, is used to reference other data. Is it your intention to only update some of the data in the article, leaving behind two different sources from two different era? Wouldn't it be better to wait until the article could be updated completely and have data from a consistent source and timeframe? -- Mikeblas (talk) 14:56, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing heard after a couple of weeks, so I've reverted these changes. The article does need an update, but that should be done with rigor and not haphazardly. -- Mikeblas (talk) 13:39, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]