Jump to content

Talk:Everyday Shooter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

USB Controller Support

[edit]

Added USB controller support to article. Steam version allows controller use :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.227.156.40 (talk) 00:36, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also of note, though - this controller support is *not* analog on both sticks. Between shooting and moving, one of them is 8-directions only. (I forget which) --Johnruble (talk) 16:53, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Availability

[edit]

Windows availability? Can't seem to find it anywhere.

This game won't be free [1], but should be available for Windows. It sounds like it might be distributed by Gametap. No clue, I couldn't find anything on the forums.--Riff 21:08, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unless whoever removed the Windows link can find a definitive statement from Queasy/Jonathan Mak about it not being for Windows I would appreciate it if you didn't strip it from the info box. I'm going on this forum post for Windows computability: http://queasygames.5.forumer.com/index.php?showtopic=1407 No where do I see Jonathan say its going to be a PS3 exclusive. --Riff 13:08, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarism in Article

[edit]

Please don't just copy and paste text in from the homepage and call it an article. Not only is that quote vague as all get go, but you didn't source who said it. I went through and tried to add some actual meat to the article. If anyone has actually played it and can flesh out the article more that would be great. I just had to go on what I could glean from that youtube link at the bottom. So go to and add some actual content, I have no illusions how lacking my description is. (: --Riff 21:08, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Australia

[edit]

This game is still not available on the PlayStation 3 Network in Australia.

Notable Because...

[edit]

There's a new trend in most Wikipedia articles which includes an interesting style like "this title is notable because", "this person is notable because". I don't think that this is the correct way to establish the notability. Say, in this article; being developed by a single person does not make a video game notable. Are there any reliable third party documentation, review or etc. about the game? This is what should be questioned.--Alperen (talk) 19:28, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]