Talk:Exhibition catalogue

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Photography: History

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject History of photography.

References

Kosigrim (or anyone else), just what would you like to see referenced? -- Hoary 23:43, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikification

For that matter, perhaps you could also give some examples of how the article should "be wikified to meet Wikipedia's quality standards." -- Hoary 23:53, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Art or museum exhibition catalogues

It would help for this section to include a list of typical or standard descriptive content in these catalogues, and its format. If an accepted style manual exists, what is it and where is it maintained? This might be supported by an External links section, which this page presently lacks. -- Deborahjay (talk) 07:31, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Exhibition catalogue. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150307044245/http://www.artedit.org/styleguide.htm to http://www.artedit.org/styleguide.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:28, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Re)move the bit about trade fair catalogues?

It strikes me that exhibition catalogues in the gallery and museum context are a form of book with a decent amount of academic and other literature on them (none of which is cited in this article but that's another topic). Trade fair catalogues, as described in the article, are a very different thing and would probably be better off covered as a section in the trade fair article instead?

Ascendingrisingharmonising (talk) 15:55, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with moving the second definition, feel free to go ahead, with "see also" links in both directions. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 16:08, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]