Talk:Extremely large telescope

Astronomy Mid‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

‹See TfM›

Physics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

‹See TfM›

Glass

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Glass, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of glass on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GlassWikipedia:WikiProject Physics/Taskforces/GlassTemplate:WikiProject Glassglass articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Engineering

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Comments

This article needs a reference for the claim that "An extremely large telescope is a telescope of more than 20m diameter". Thue | talk 20:55, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Amendments to the lead, diameter and bigger than ELTs

"Telescopes for other wavelengths can be much bigger..." Since the cited sources define the aperture of an ELT in the range of 20m to 100m, (and I amended the lead accordingly after adding an alternative URL to the previously removed source), it seemed confusing to mention the 100m-Green Bank Telescope as an example for a much bigger telescope. Instead, I replaced it with the Arecibo Observatory. In addition, I changed the above statement to "Telescopes for radio wavelengths can be much bigger", since they are all radio telescopes (please verify) -- Cheers, Rfassbind -talk 19:02, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:European Extremely Large Telescope which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 09:45, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The renaming is official. I wonder if we can move this article to Extremely large telescopes as it describes a class of objects. --mfb (talk) 14:26, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Extremely large telescope. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:06, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for more recent versions of the web pages would be ideal, but for now at least we have archived versions. --mfb (talk) 15:59, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Extremely large telescope. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150518234711/https://www.science.org.au/sites/default/files/user-content/resources/file/eltroadmap040917.pdf to https://www.science.org.au/sites/default/files/user-content/resources/file/eltroadmap040917.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:15, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Colossus

This seems like nothing more than a technology suggestion by a small group of developers. I didn't find on the internet any hint that it is even considered for budgeting. All references are from colossus.com. For now I'm removing this section for relevance reasons. 217.132.48.168 (talk) 18:51, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My initial opinion is that the removal makes sense. And, if further supporting sources are found, then the section can always be reinstated with with the new information. Senator2029 “Talk” 22:08, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Meaning of the rank and colors in the table?

The table is sorted in a sensible order, from biggest to smallest, but the rank column of the table goes in the opposite order, from 5 for the biggest telescope to 1 for the smallest one, which is confusing. Also, the two last rows have different colors than the others. What is the meaning of this color? Amaurea (talk) 21:38, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I swapped the number ordering. I suspect that the numbers were by time of first light when they were added, but that changed since then. The last two have a color because they are just there for comparison with existing telescopes. With their size they are not extremely large telescopes. Not sure why they have two colors instead of just one. It was changed in 2014 without edit comment. --mfb (talk) 23:03, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative artist's rendering with guide stars=

Instead of File:Artist’s rendering of the ELT in operation.jpg in the stills section, would http://www.eso.org/public/products/calendars/cal202208/ be better? I think it's CC-BY 4.0. Cheers, cmɢʟee⎆τaʟκ 00:15, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]