Jump to content

Talk:Faye Ginsburg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

The sources for this article work properly when clicked. Additionally, the information in the article is accurately paraphrased.Sirias (talk) 00:11, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sirias. Peer reviewers: Mpraml, Evanalligatorwhite.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:13, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

[edit]

To make the notability of the article clear, it would be better to put any awards she has won in the top section. The links work, and the article has stayed neutral in its language. The article mostly consists of bullet-pointed lists, and it looks sloppy. I suggest that the Awards and Works sections be turned into paragraph format. This way, information about Ginsburg's published works can be added (and can also be divided into subsections such as books, articles, etc.). I believe that looking at book reviews can help with this process, and will cushion the article with more references. A separate section for Ginsburg's education and career could also be added if the information is available, and can be used to create an infobox. Is there any way that you could go into the history of the Center for Media, Culture, and History? When was it founded? Is there any published information on the process Ginsburg had to go through to found it? Also, does Ginsburg have a history of activism or membership with organizations that could be added? This article is short, but it is clear that Ginsburg is an important anthropologist from the amount of work she has put out. That being said, there is a lot of potential with this article. Good luck!Mpraml (talk) 15:48, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Peer Review: You seem to have a good start on the article with lots of sources and links to relevant material to your topic. However, I would be careful and making sure that you have enough text to go along with your sources. Anther thing that I think would be interesting would be to epand on the awards she has received and their importance to her and the work that she does — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markeclartin (talkcontribs) 02:27, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]