Jump to content

Talk:Floyd Mayweather Jr. vs. Conor McGregor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reach

[edit]

The reach should be included in the infobox. If someone could do that, that would be very much appreciated. 2A02:C7F:465B:E000:E521:1DB:ED70:2390 (talk) 15:54, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

how is this fight regulated?

[edit]

I notice that there's no mention of if any boxing championship is on the line or if the boxers will have to pass drug tests comparable to what USADA does. Before anyone mentions WP:SOFIXIT, I'm entitled to be a lazy reader of Wikipedia every now and then. Chris Troutman (talk) 14:30, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Racial Controversy

[edit]

How come there is no mention of Conor McGregor's "So dance for me boy" comments. Mobile mundo (talk) 00:11, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done (Mobile mundo (talk) 21:11, 6 April 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 27 August 2017

[edit]

In the July 29th, 2017 writeup: change "would defend his IBF World super featherweight title" to "would defend his IBF junior lightweight title" Snowcrasher (talk) 02:59, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: The page's protection level has changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. SparklingPessimist Scream at me! 17:15, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 27 August 2017

[edit]

Under conner's record it acuatly is 21-3 and not the given 21-4 Yashovaats (talk) 05:27, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: According to the page's protection level you should be able to edit the page yourself. If you seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. — IVORK Discuss 02:56, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Encyclopedic worthiness

[edit]

Okay, so I tried to start a debate on this entry's place in an encyclopedia.

Is this really worth an entry on Wikipedia. Two men had a fight for a lot of money, but that's boxing for you, and created a lot of PR and bluster for a while, but again that's just how boxing works. It wasn't for a title, it wasn't for anything special, it was simply a PR exercise and about money. Perhaps it will continue to create more than a bit of talk in a few years, but at the moment, there's nothing particularly special about this fight and hence its place in an encyclopedia. 81.156.182.211 (talk) 18:30, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]