Talk:French battleship République

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the French battleship République article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

French battleship République has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

French battleship République is part of the Battleships of France series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 15, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
October 16, 2012	Good topic candidate	Promoted
August 25, 2020	Good topic candidate	Promoted
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 4, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the French battleship République* was hit by a torpedo from the* Patrie, her sister ship?
Current status: Good article

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / European / French / World War I / Operation Majestic Titan

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	World War I task force
	Operation Majestic Titan (Phase I)

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Service history

Hold on, an article about a French battleship that served from 1906 to 1921 with no mention of World War I, not even an explanation as to why she didn't participate (assuming that's why no mention of it)? This is very hard to accept. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 18:59, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What isn't in the sources isn't there. Apparently these two ships spent most of their time in port. - The Bushranger _{Return fire}^{Flank speed} 14:47, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:French battleship République/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 20:22, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):
b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Infobox

No issues

Lead

No issues

Design

No issues

Service history

No issues

Footnotes

No issues

References

No issues

After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have concluded that this article meets the good article criteria at this time. Congratulations and keep up the good work! Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 20:42, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]