Talk:Fundraiser (The Office)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Fundraiser (The Office) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic star Fundraiser (The Office) is part of the The Office (U.S. season 8) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
June 18, 2012 Good article nominee Listed
November 7, 2012 Good topic candidate Promoted
Current status: Good article
WikiProject Television / Episode coverage / The Office (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of television on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the episode coverage task force (marked as Low-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by The Office task force.
 
WikiProject Comedy (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Fundraiser (The Office)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 19:12, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    Quality of article is good.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    Article complies with MoS.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    Good.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    Sources included where needed.
    C. No original research:
    No original research found.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    All major aspects of the topic have been covered.
    B. Focused:
    Article remains focused at all times.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    No bias found.
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    Article is stable.
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    Fair-use image is licensed properly and other image is released into the public domain.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    Images are provided and appropriate and contain suitable captions.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Nothing needs to be fixed in this article. Pass!--Dom497 (talk) 19:29, 18 June 2012 (UTC)