Talk:GTV (Australian TV station)

Australia: Melbourne / Television Mid‑importance

	Australia portal GTV (Australian TV station) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian television (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Television: Stations Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[The AFL Footy Show#The Sunday Footy Show|The AFL Sunday Footy Show]] Anchor The AFL Footy Show#The Sunday Footy Show links to a specific web page: The Sunday Footy Show (AFL). The anchor (#The Sunday Footy Show) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Fair use rationale for Image:GTV(9)1957.png

Image:GTV(9)1957.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:50, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

70's Newsreaders: John Bailey & Pete Smith also Tracy Grimshaw

I am unaware if these people read the news in Melbourne. They may have so if anyone could shed some light on this? Brad F 89 (talk) 12:51, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also can anyone confirm the years Tracy Grimshaw was a newsreader? Brad F 89 (talk) 05:56, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Future Programming

I'm not sure why someone has added future programming of network programs, given maost are overseas and have nothing to do wth GTV9. What do others think? Brad F 89 (talk) 05:54, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bad English Use in Introduction?

I'm really not sure what the following is supposed to mean, and as there are no references in this article that link from there I am unsure what to change it to: "It was the primary commercial TV stations in Melbourne, and amongst the first to begin transmission in Australia." Could someone please fix this? Thankyou. --Kuliwil (talk) 08:02, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the vague claim of primacy. I have also moved the "amongst the first" statement into the relevant part of the history section.

RJ4 (talk) 04:42, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Channel Nine logo.png

The image File:Channel Nine logo.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --06:16, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on GTV (Australia). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111106044055/http://www.gtv9.com.au/ to http://gtv9.com.au/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:07, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]