Talk:Gaelcholáiste Chéitinn

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Northern Ireland

	Northern Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

Name

Not sure that such in-depth review of Seathrún Céitinn is necessary in the article. A sentence or two with a simple link would more than suffice. RashersTierney (talk) 15:40, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I thought this too. There's little or nothing about the school and a litany about Seathrún Céitinn. I agree with the idea of a link. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.71.111.190 (talk) 10:39, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Material Removal

Hey, just wanted to say that I just removed most of the article in my most recent edit, because most of the article was promotional/had no sources/was not clearly relevant to the school, including a conclusion section that seemed to be arguing something about public support. (Sentence fragments mean that I really don't know what it was meant to read originally.) Having done all that, the article is definitely a lot more stub-like, so I figured I should just pop in on the talk page for a second. If anybody disagrees, that's fine; we can talk about it here on my talk page. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 17:21, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]