Talk:GeoEye

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Maps Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Maps and Cartography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MapsWikipedia:WikiProject MapsTemplate:WikiProject MapsMaps articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article had an importance automatically assigned to it. Once it has been checked by a human, please remove `\|autoi=yes`.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

[Untitled]

FYI, an article by this name was deleted twice before: [1]. It certainly seems notable to me. Here are some news links from Google. —Fleminra 20:57, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. It's the same person doing it, too. I'm convinced that someone has a beef with GeoEye. On the other hand, I believe we need to properly organize this article. Aviation Week & Space Technology's source book that was just sent out has some good info, and I plan to incorporate that info and clean up the formatting. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 21:02, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it is kind of sad that the bird has a better page than the company! I've added some stuff to the article to make it look more like a wiki page is supposed to, but the Company Infobox REALLY needs some help. I'll fill in some more tonight if I can. --Mdwyer 21:35, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've filled it in and fluffed up the article quite a bit more. I think it would survive a deletion request, now.

It would be nice to attach a sample of their imagery to the article -- especially the one that shows a picture of their Thornton ground station from space -- but I don't want to have to explain to their lawyers that I want one of their pictures for free. --Mdwyer 05:24, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OrbView 1

Some discussion of Orbview 1 (aka MicroLab 1) would be nice; wikipedia makes it seem like this satellite never existed. 128.138.215.52 (talk) 22:23, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why would they do this?

Can someone please explain or provide a citation for the statement "It is a major client of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency." wich is in the introduction. My instinct is that the writer meant to say "National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency is a major client.". 132.38.190.22 (talk) 20:30, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

mailing address versus location

The mailing address is Herndon, but the actual location of the headquarters is in Dulles Corner, which is entirely outside Herndon (in unincorporated Loudoun and Fairfax counties). TEDickey (talk) 23:37, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that the mailing address is Dulles Corner Blvd, which is within the limits of Herndon. Tmduffy (talk) 00:04, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 5 external links on GeoEye. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:05, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on GeoEye. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:16, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on GeoEye. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:08, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]