Talk:Gerard Lyons

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Sighsbolt (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.
Abigswin (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.
Amloveg (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.
Gbafl (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.
81.98.75.147 (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.
62.255.225.105 (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

Missing Info

Where did mum work? What did Dad do at LT? Any books, publications etc of note? Politics and lobbying? Mcsony (talk) 19:40, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Questionable Info

I took a guess at the school of economics and I have no idea of what influences would tie to him. Mcsony (talk) 19:40, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gerard Lyons. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:41, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

COI

This edit in 2016 added unsourced favourable sounding material; it's likely to have been by someone closely connected to the subject. Fences&Windows 16:30, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Second sentence

The second sentence begins "He is clueless on the world economy.." This does not sound like a very encyclopedic style at all. Vorbee (talk) 19:52, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reads like a Resumé

Copy editing this, I feel like I'm helping this guy brush up his resumé. Is it really necessary to have each and every council he was a part of?LizzieMack (talk) 16:34, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like some of the resume-y fluff has been cleaned up. I'll take a crack at further clean up. Paisarepa (talk) 21:39, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Still needs a lot of work, but some of the sections are cleaned up to be less of a resume and less overly detailed. Paisarepa (talk) 22:11, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New COI activity

typically of an SPA/COI, they remove the COI tag because 'they have fixed the issue'(!) - failing to realise they ARE the issue. This article has had long-standing COI issues from various SPAs over many years. The article is in places poorly referenced, overly detailed with the minutiae of the subject's career - far too much lavish CVing rather than concise, encyclopaedic content. Until there's a consensus from a quorum of truly independent editors (i.e. not the SPAs) on the talk page, I propose the tags remain. Rayman60 (talk) 16:05, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry!!

Sorry editors!! Due to some system issues i made some blunders. But hopelly they are alright now or can be improve by other editor if not. Sorry!! (HinaBB (talk) 09:39, 20 September 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Ref error

@SecretName101: please fill in a source for the "WhoWere" ref name. -- Fyrael (talk) 04:56, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]