Jump to content

Talk:Ghada Karmi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 16:23, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Ghada Karmi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:50, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

the beautiful bride

[edit]

Apart from the title of her book and a recount of the story in an epigraph at the start, the bride story plays an insignificant part in her book. There are two very brief references to it in over 300 pages and no conclusion is drawn in either case. The claim from a biased source that she "admitted that the phrase ... was not based on facts", implying that she knew it was a false story, is a BLP violation. What she actually admitted was that she got the story from Avi Shlaim and didn't have a primary source for it. That's entirely different; the difference between non-ethical and ethical behavior for a historian. Zerotalk 01:54, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]