Talk:Gonzales v. Oregon
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Unclear sentence
[edit]"It is possible that Harriet Miers helped create the government's argument in the case." What does this mean? I did not change it, but I do not understand it. I changed the next sentence since she has withdrawn. --Rob 13:59, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
- Government lawyers were arguing against the Oregon statute, and Miers may have advised them on the arguments they should make, cases they should cite, etc. BD2412 talk 14:09, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
case summaries
[edit]the summary of the opinion and the dissent is bad should be re written to include reference to Auer and a more detailed outline of the reasoning not just one or two of the less than crucial points —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.175.108.53 (talk) 09:49, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class U.S. Supreme Court articles
- Low-importance U.S. Supreme Court articles
- WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases articles
- C-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- C-Class Oregon articles
- Mid-importance Oregon articles
- WikiProject Oregon pages
- C-Class Death articles
- Low-importance Death articles
- C-Class Suicide articles
- Low-importance Suicide articles
- Suicide articles