Talk:Goodwin Sands

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Kent Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Kent tasks:

Here are some Kent related tasks you can do:

Clean up an article: Here are automatically generated lists of articles needing cleanup sorted alphabetically and by category.
Edit the Top and High importance articles.
Refine/polish: Ashford, Royal Tunbridge Wells, Canterbury
Expand:: List of churches in Kent, Maidstone Borough Council
NPOV: K College
Citation needed: Unreferenced Kent articles
Cleanup/Copyedit: Kingdom of Kent
Expert attention: Channel Tunnel, Bromley Civic Society
Stubs: see Kent geography stubs articles

Note: These articles may overlap with those on other related lists. If you would like to make a change, either do so yourself, or make a suggestion.

Untitled

I believe the Ian Flemming James Bond book Moonraker takes place, at least partially, on the Goodwin Sands. I will confirm shortly. Can anyone confirm the 1950's ship wreck Flemming mentions?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Illcommunication (talk • contribs) 18:26, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Lady Lovibond story is legendary, rather than factual, and cannot be substantiated in any known records of wrecks or sources from the period, e.g. Lloyd's List, Lloyd's Register, contemporary newspapers or diaries or any other sources. It's a romantic story, but that's all it is, I'm afraid. Vandenwyngaerde (talk) 18:01, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Map

Map would be useful. Drutt (talk) 16:27, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It would be more accurate to say that the sands are in the North Sea. They are not in the Channel! See IHO, International Hydrographic Office for geographical limits to these. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.17.85.166 (talk) 21:57, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notable events — 11th Century

The citation for the supposed inundation of farmland that now forms the Goodwin Sands is Brewer's Dictionary of Phrase and Fable. Is it right to justify a statement of fact to an acknowledged fable? Tagged {{Verify credibility}}--217.155.32.221 (talk) 15:17, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--Because this section is directly contradicted by the preceding section, which is sourced to scientific, rather than folkloric, references, it should be eliminated. The preceding section clearly sets out the apocryphal nature of the story. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:02, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Goodwin Sands/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Images or diagram of the bank would be nice, rated as start Richard Thompson (Talk! | Contribs) 08:03, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 08:03, 27 March 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 16:30, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Goodwin Sands. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:46, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Who was Goodwin?

Any clues? Valetude (talk) 03:01, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Read the section Island of Lomea, in particular the link to Godwin, Earl of Wessex. He was the father of King Harold Godwinson of 1066 fame. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 08:30, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Martin. And forgive my carelessness. Valetude (talk) 00:32, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Controversial dredging

There is no explanation of why it was "controversial". The reference URL is dead, and archive.org has only the front page which does not mention it. Davidships (talk) 07:24, 9 June 2022 (UTC) (added with this diff) Davidships (talk) 07:43, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]