Talk:Google hacking

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Computer Security / Computing  (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Some cleaning[edit]

I'm feeling an obsessive compulsion to improve the writing in this article, particularly near the beginning. No offense intended to anyone; hopefully, my changes will be generally agreed-upon as improvements. ryan bagueros » i know en + pt-br + es » talk 21:44, 2 November 2011 (UTC)


Is Google hacking legal? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Legokid (talkcontribs) 06:34, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

It's legal to find vulnerable sites using Google; it's not legal to actually try to do anything to them. --Scgtrp (talk) 02:32, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Page Creation[edit]

As of this time, there is only one wiki page that deals with Google Hacking, and that is Google Hacks, which advertises a particular book. After changes were recently made to Google Hacks to remove all non-book related material, a seperate page for Google Hacking as a whole was necessitated. Rurik 17:10, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

for more information on google —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 19:59, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Sri Harsha Varada — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 15:54, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Google hacking. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

  • Attempted to fix sourcing for //http:/
  • Attempted to fix sourcing for //http:/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Question? Archived sources still need to be checked

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:03, 29 March 2016 (UTC)