This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked
Coverage and accuracy: not checked
Structure: not checked
Grammar and style: not checked
Supporting materials: not checked
To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call:
This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
this article, as with nearly every article in wikipedia on UFO, shows POV bias and factual inaccuracy. it does this despite the recent ODNI affirmation that UFO (or UAP, same thing) are real -- so real, in fact, that they pose a "potential threat to national security." the article presents the conclusions of the notoriously biased "Blue Book" as authoritative judgments and the judgments of amateur ufo "historian" and country singer jerome clark as "the final word."
gorman is said to have "chased jupiter" in confusion. in fact, according to the latest version of stellarium planetarium software (0.21.2), jupiter was below the horizon at the time and place of the pursuit, so gorman could not have chased it by mistake.
gorman's actual flight documentation shows that he broke off pursuit of the object when it was accelerating vertically; he stalled out at around 14500 feet in what he documents as a vertical climb. you don't chase planets on the horizon by sticking toward zenith.
gorman describes the light as changing both emittance frequency and luminance as it changed speed; passive balloons, even when fitted with running lights, do not show such change.
i don't have the wikiskills to upload an image, but the drawing by gorman of his and the UFO maneuvers during the encounter has been declassified. i hope a user will link it to this article.
i am pointing to this article as an example of the pervasive and counterfactual wikipedia POV bias, despite the affirmations from ODNI that it is not "pseudoscience" or "crackpot conspiracy". i am pointing out three specific ways that the "conclusions" of the USAF misinformation program and are taken as the "final word" over the conclusions of both Ruppelt, who actually ran "blue book" for two years, and real scientists such as McDonald and Hynek. finally, separate from these substantive points: i suggest wikipedia review its editorial policies toward UFO reports and give the "skeptical" and "authoritative" viewpoints less credence, and treat both official government reports before 2019 and books with titles such as "the UFO myth" with less credence. in many cases pronouncements from such sources are misleading if not outright fabrications. Drollere (talk) 05:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
