Jump to content

Talk:Gossip (Paul Kelly and the Coloured Girls album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Gossip (Paul Kelly and the Coloured Girls album)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
Start class:
  • Green tickY A reasonably complete infobox
  • Green tickY A lead section giving an overview of the album
  • Green tickY A track listing
  • Green tickY Reference to at least primary personnel by name (must specify performers on the current single; a band navbox is insufficient)
  • Green tickY Categorisation at least by artist and year

C-class:

  • Green tickY All the start class criteria
  • Green tickY A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art
  • Green tickY At least one section of prose (in addition to the lead section)
  • Green tickY A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs
  • Green tickY A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians
  • Green tickY Reliable independent in-line references supporting claims
  • Green tickY A casual reader should learn something about the album

B-class:

  • Green tickY All the C-class criteria
  • Green tickY A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details
  • Green tickY A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians
  • Green tickY No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources
  • Green tickY No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS
  • Green tickY No obvious omissions, but also no obvious extraneous information – such as "trivia"

Evaluation based on WikiProject Albums assessment scale. Please update this list when the article meets any of the above criteria, changing the article's class assessment as appropriate.

Importance for WP:AUSMUS/albums up to Mid due to impact of album (and related singles) on Paul Kelly's career both nationally and internationally.

Self-assessed, and hence may be biased, by – Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 20:34, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 20:34, 11 October 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 16:32, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gossip (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:02, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]