Jump to content

Talk:Grünenthal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: article moved, uncontested requested move after 7 days ~~ GB fan ~~ 15:21, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Chemie Grünenthal of Stolberg-am-Rhein → Grünenthal GmbH — Chemie Grünenthal of Stolberg-am-Rhein is the old name of this company. The current and correct name is Grünenthal GmbH Antwerpes (talk) 14:31, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A first step would be to mention the new name in the lead section, in bold as article title, whilst keeping a mention of the previous name as well, also bolded.
Seeing as the target is blank and de:Grünenthal GmbH carries the name without issue I don't see why you shouldn't move it yourself. WP:BOLD

Sf5xeplus (talk) 17:43, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You for Your answer! I´m sorry, but I can´t move it myself, because i´m not an autoconfirmed user. Is there the possibility, that You move it for me? That would be very kind of You. Thanks in advanced! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Antwerpes (talk • contribs) 13:44, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

"The firm was a branch of ...": which corporation ?

[edit]

"The firm was a branch of a soaps, toiletries, and cosmetics business which was formed a short time after World War II." is written in the introduction . What was the NAME of the corporation Grünenthal was a branch of ? Trente7cinq (talk) 06:32, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Complete revision of the article; new facts, references and format

[edit]

Hi, I overwrote much of the article, because it wasn't particularly accurate and much facts missed in it. If you find some grammatical failures, please correct them. Furthermore, there was no mention of the current situation of the business and the payment to the Foundation. Please do not overload the article with details, which relate to other articles, such as Thaladomide! This one has only to inform about Grünenthal and although the Contargan scandal has to be mentioned it's not the only historical important part. And please do visit the German article Contergan scandal where the whole topic is discribed very well (very useful for Thaladomide). --111Alleskoenner (talk) 19:58, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Physicians commiting crimes in Nazi concentration camps working for Grünenthal after WW II

[edit]

See the talk page for this article on german Wikipedia. User:Polentario did not wish to have them named in the article. He was blocked in german-language Wikipedia for one day because of using the means of edit-waring and Wikipedia:No personal attacks. --Blogotron (talk) 17:43, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be untrue

[edit]

"One reason for the initially unobserved side effects of the drug and the subsequent approval in Germany was that at that time drugs did not have to be tested for teratogenic effects."

Per reuters, this is untrue, and it appears to be sourced to grunenthal itself, in a broken link. The vfa link makes similar claims, for what it's worth.192.249.47.186 (talk) 16:13, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Separately, under "Further drug development" article says that "In 2018, Grünenthal acquired the pain-related brands Nexium...", how exactly is stomach acid neutralizer painkiller and according to whom? Sorry my bad editing skills.. --80.221.248.37 (talk) 21:21, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Grünenthal GmbH. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:10, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Grünenthal GmbH. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:18, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Grünenthal GmbH. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:42, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Grünenthal&oldid=1202482331"