Talk:HMSAS Bloemfontein
Appearance
HMSAS Bloemfontein has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: November 18, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the HMSAS Bloemfontein article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:HMSAS Bloemfontein/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 17:05, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Will do this shortly. JAGUAR 17:05, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- "built for the Royal Navy (RN)" - does the abbreviation need to be here if it's not used in the article? I wouldn't have thought it needed to be used at all
- "The ship was equipped with a Type 271 surface-search radar" - might sound better with an extra 'also': The ship was also equipped with a Type 271 surface-search radar. Feel free to ignore
- "until the shore-based training establishment then under construction was completed" - is this the same thing as a stone frigate? I learnt that term when I was writing Portsmouth, and was tempted for a while to bring HMS Vernon (shore establishment) to GA status!
- I wish you would! I have some secondary data on a few of the major stone frigates, but nowhere enough to even consider bringing them up to even a B-class. Added a link.
- "and did so until she was laid up in 1947 at Devonport Royal Dockyard" - link laid up here
- Linked in the lede.
- "Rosamund was purchased by the South African Navy later that year" - South African Navy is never actually linked in this article
- Reworked the lede a little to fix this.
- No dead links
- No DAB links
Looking good, I couldn't find many issues with this one as it's well written and compact. Will leave on hold until all are clarified! JAGUAR 17:18, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. I trust everything is to your satisfaction.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:29, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for addressing them so quickly! By all means this is good to go. I did have a couple of history books on Portsmouth which did extensively cover HMS Vernon but unfortunately I sent them back to the WMF only a few days ago! I think I still might have enough information to write it though, but we'll see. JAGUAR 22:19, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- GA-Class Ships articles
- All WikiProject Ships pages
- GA-Class Shipwreck articles
- Unknown-importance Shipwreck articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- GA-Class African military history articles
- African military history task force articles
- GA-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- GA-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- GA-Class South Africa articles
- Low-importance South Africa articles
- WikiProject South Africa articles
- GA-Class Underwater diving articles
- Low-importance Underwater diving articles
- WikiProject Underwater diving articles