Talk:Haig Point Range Lights

A fact from Haig Point Range Lights appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 July 2008, and was viewed approximately 0 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that in 1986, after about 60 years of darkness, a lamp was again activated in the Haig Point lighthouse?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/July.

Wikipedia

Lighthouses Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lighthouses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lighthouses and other water navigational aids on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LighthousesWikipedia:WikiProject LighthousesTemplate:WikiProject LighthousesLighthouses articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: South Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	South Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject South Carolina.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Haig Point Range Lights. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080708093130/http://www.haigpoint.com/index.html to http://www.haigpoint.com/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:50, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Awkward phrasing

@MSGJ: In regards to your recent revert on Haig Point Range Lights, I just wanted to reference a couple of items:

Manual of Style of gender-neutral language: MOS:GNL
There was also a recent debate on the Village Pump on this type of edit as well
There are numerous other examples of a lighthouse being 'staffed' vice 'manned'. Picking a couple at random:

Could we further discuss the potential 'subjectiveness'? It reads fine to me, and brings the article in-line with the above guidance.

Thanks! CaptainAngus (talk) 13:16, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CaptainAngus. Staffing a lighthouse does not seem appropriate to me, perhaps due to the nature the job. It would be similarly awkward to talk about staffing a ship. Furthermore I do not go along with the gender-neutral argument, especially as lighthouse keeping is very much an historical occupation. The discussion that I saw on this was purely referring to space flights and not other articles. I will check the other discussion you referenced above, but perhaps more opinions should be sought before changing this on a mass scale? Regards — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:28, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MSGJ: Hi, sorry for the delay here, the other conversation took a slightly different course. In this case, I would still advocate for 'staffing', because I think it fits the bill and it seems to be in use across other articles on lighthouses. However, I'm up for other terms as well. Some alternatives I'd like to suggest:

This light was kept until about 1924.
This light was tended until about 1924.
This lighthouse kept a duty staff until about 1924.

You cite lighthouse keeping as a historical occupation, but I don't follow the argument. The duties are not gender specific, and my goal in this edit to reflect that. The lighthouse just needs a 'person' there to run it, not a man.

Please let me know what you think about my suggested alternatives, or if you have any other ideas! CaptainAngus (talk) 00:17, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]