Talk:Hakea macrocarpa

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Northern Territory / Western Australia / Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Hakea macrocarpa is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Northern Territory (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia, or the Northern Territory Library.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Distribution

Did you actually read the references? Two very clearly state "WA, NT, Qld", "W.A. and N.T. and western Qld". Another two are maps that clearly show a distribution in Qld. I can not find as single reference included here which states that the distribution excludes Queensland, despite your protestations. Since you seems to believe otherwise, to the point of reverting a simple request for references, can you please quote that reference? We can then alter the article to reflect this disputed distribution, since it will clearly contradict all references already in article. I suspect that you won't actually be able to do this. 49.255.59.94 (talk) 23:51, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]