Talk:Hanako (fish)

Fishes Mid‑importance

	Fish portal This article is part of WikiProject Fishes, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to Fish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.FishesWikipedia:WikiProject FishesTemplate:WikiProject FishesFishes articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Japan Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 06:48, October 29, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Hanako.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:21, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The dates don't add up

The age analyses (which I understand are not gospel) don't all correlate with the rest of the age data. I had instinct to correct this, but am not feeling bold and would like to leave it to someone more familiar. 79.69.45.60 (talk) 16:25, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. If a good high age is at 50 years, then +200 is ... very, very strange. There has to be better documentation before we can accept such claims IMO, such as date of birth certificates that are reproducible. 2A02:8388:1604:F600:A023:1A46:73DC:AD2 (talk) 00:00, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A birth certificate for a fish? E Eng 00:45, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The source disputing the validity of the age claims doesn't mention Hanako

Looking at the source disputing it, it doesn't even mention Hanako. It's a study about the accuracy of otolith age determination of a different species of carp. The proposed 226 year figure wasn't determined using otoliths but rather through analysis of scales. 88.129.109.236 (talk) 15:07, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

poor evidence of the claims of its age — Preceding unsigned comment added by Newrednight (talk • contribs) 17:22, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]