Talk:Hani Miletski

Ethical or animal rights controversies regarding Hani's position on bestiality?

I am a survivor of mother-son incest and as such respect Hani for tackling the topic. Where other women indulge in shameless demonization of men as sex-crime monsters, Hani shows that perfectly sane mothers often do rape their sons. This is a great service, albeit on a topic that we men must take on ourselves because no woman can have a clue about what a man feels when he is raped by his mother. Mother-son incest is also a pretty, dry and 'objective' book about mothers who have sex with their sons...she does not befriend these mothers or take their sides in this terrible crime...in fact she busts many of the shameless myths about female sexual aggression here...the most common and idiotic one being that mothers who rape their sons are insane.

However, I also read Hani's book on sex with animals with disgust and distrust because she like many therapists seems unable to connect such conduct with overall ethical standards. As is shown in the following links other people seem to share these concerns. [1] To use and abuse a dependant animal to have sex is in my opinion even more obscene than using and abusing an innocent child for sex...because an animal is far more dependent and unaware than a child in many ways. (please note that I kill and eat animals, as care-fully as possible, but I also love animals because when I look in their eyes I see my soul reflected back as well...so I am no animal rights' nut case.) In her book, Hani seems sypathize with this conduct or at a the very least does not take a strong position against it. This needs to be shown in this article because it is an important part of who Hani is as an author and no doubt as a professional sex therapist too.

On a more personal note, any person who considers therapy from Hani or any other sex therapist would be well advised to use caution because this kind of ethical inanity is quite common in the therapy business which prides itself on being 'non-judgemental', 'compassionate' and 'empathetic' at all costs. In my opinion, the entire therapy profession needs to take it's head out of its collective '___' and look at the whole society rather than just at the narcissistic needs of few paying patients...but I don't imagine that will happen in my lifetime. Shameless sex is stupid, selfish, and dangerous sex when it involves innocent children or animals. Judgment, passion and acknowledgement are much needed here therapists.71.102.254.114 02:33, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

hi how r u? what is meaning of hany

References

I don't think it is usual practice to include quotated text in <ref> tags. The reference should simply give title, author, publisher, date etc. and where appropriate include relevant page number(s). If the quote is deemed necessary, I think it is more usual to include it in the main text (perhaps as a blockquote), and cite a reference to where the quote was originally published. See WP:CITE --Romney yw (talk) 08:54, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

"Miletski's study has never been published in any peer-reviewed journal"

I'm deleting this; it ignores that it's an adaptation of a doctoral thesis, and therefore was reviewed by experts; that parts of it have been published in Anthrozoos; and unfairly implies that her work is not of good quality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.48.141.38 (talk) 10:09, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hani Miletski. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080704112559/http://www.justice.gov.uk/docs/280907.pdf to http://www.justice.gov.uk/docs/280907.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:18, 29 October 2017 (UTC)