Talk:Hardstone carving

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Archaeology (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.


Why would the article include a link to the Flintstones? I've removed it, but seems there is some reverting going on. Please explain. Vsmith (talk) 01:04, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

It has been there since the article was written a few years ago, and is partly a joke, but also making a serious point. You were the last to revert, so you can explain yourself! Meanwhile I am reverting you. Anyone else who objects to the reference, please say so here before changing it again. Johnbod (talk) 03:43, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Hmm.. been there since day one. How is that a reason to keep "a joke" (even partly so?) in an article? As you added that unsourced "joke" bit perhaps you can add it back with a WP:RS. Vsmith (talk) 14:17, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Good, I am glad that it has been removed. It did not belong there. Sarcasm is hard to sell without vocal tone. --Bejnar (talk) 18:56, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
It was never sarcasm - see a dictionary. Johnbod (talk) 01:14, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Inlay is not hardstone carving[edit]

The Mezo-American section should deal more with pectorials and carved masks and not the inlay. Inlay is not hardstone carving. --Bejnar (talk) 18:50, 10 June 2014 (UTC)