Jump to content

Talk:H. J. R. Murray

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Indian Origin Theory

[edit]

I am removing the statement that Murray was the first to publish the theory of Chess's Indian origin. Anyone who reads his book will know that this theory was posited long before him, by Antonius van der Linde, Thomas Hyde, Sir William Jones, etc.

Revision

[edit]

What "revision" has Murray's theory that chess began in India undergone? As far as I know, A History of Chess is still considered an authoritative source on the history of chess. If this is referring to the theory that chess originated in China, although that theory has a few adherents, it is generally rejected by chess scholars as lacking evidence. Quale 06:59, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


A good summary can be found in Michael Mark's article "The Beginnings of Chess," free available online with a google search. If you read that document, you will also see that it is incorrect that HJR Murray was the "first" to publish the theory that chess originated in India. This came almost 250 years earlier with Thomas Hyde (although I haven't read the text), and was even recorded in Sir William Jones' Asiatic Researches. Murray is very up-front about the fact that he is getting this information from professional Orientalists. [User: Guest] 13:04 13 Feb 2016 (EST)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on H. J. R. Murray. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:41, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]