Jump to content

Talk:Healie

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Healie/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Cukie Gherkin (talk · contribs) 16:30, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Pokelego999 (talk · contribs) 19:11, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


I will get to this soon. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 19:11, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Six GA Criteria[edit]

1. Article is well-written. Very minimal mistakes if any at all.

2. No OR, all info is cited in the article.

3. Coverage is broad in depth and focus. Shows multiple aspects of the character.

4. Article appears neutral, and does not appear to hold a significantly negative nor positive stance on the subject.

5. Article appears stable. Does not appear to have had any major vandalism occur.

6. Article uses one fair use image with proper rationale.

Lead[edit]

-Looks good

Appearances[edit]

-I'd clarify the ten years are in-game time so as to avoid confusion

Done.

Conception and design[edit]

-Looks good

Reception[edit]

-Looks good

Overall[edit]

-Looks good overall, though perhaps you could use Healie's human form to visually illustrate it? It's mentioned a lot, including in Reception, enough to justify the image's inclusion. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 03:47, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Added image.
Additional Source Spotcheck: @Cukie Gherkin.
I've selected some random sources to check if they verify the info they're cited for.
3: Verifies that Healie was controlled using AI.
8: Verifies that Healie is in Super Light.
10: Verifies that Healie is in Tact.
17: Verifies that Healie ranked above Ragnar.
19: Verifies cited information. However, I do worry that this source counts as a trivial mention, since it has only one sentence of commentary on Healie in the whole thing, and could likely be removed.
I think that the strength of the commentary stands out; in addition to finding him cute, saying that he's the best companion in the series and the best part of chapter 1 emphasizes, to me, his popularity. It also helps to further enhance the collective commentary about Healie's role as a support or companion character. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 16:13, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't really see that much in the source, and most of its points are verified and used by other sources. Could you point out to me where it is in the source just in case I missed it? Unrelated, but could you additionally add the romanization of Healie to the article, if it can be verified? Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 23:30, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The text I'm referring to: " The highlight of the first chapter is the monster that will become your ally, Hoimin the Hoimi Slime. In the later Dragon Quest series, there are several monsters that you can make friends with and take with you, but Hoimin is the first of them. However, even if you become a friend, it is AI controlled, so it is true that it does not move as you want. At first, it acts safely, but it is somehow brave and cute that it heals Ryan and dies." There's also a caption calling Healie the "hidden protagonist" of the chapter, though I probably wouldn't use that because it's probably just something like "I like this character" - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 15:15, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I feel it's viable as an additional source to bolster other sources' points, but I feel there's some undue weight being put onto this brief bit of commentary in the Reception as it stands right now. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 19:20, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Tweaked the content and moved it elsewhere. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 17:25, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good. Happy to pass! Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 18:09, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Additionally, there's little to no copyvio according to Earwig. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 15:56, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]