Talk:Heavy Metal 2000

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force.

Animation: Canadian / Films Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Canadian animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comics: Films Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Comic book films work group.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by AngusWOOF, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 2014-01-21.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

What year was this movie released?

I'd guess 2000, but it's not clear.

It closed about 8 picoseconds after it's release. What a shame to followup a classic with this trash.

Reception?

This entry needs a reception section. How did fans of the original like/dislike this sequel? How did critics react? --24.249.108.133 06:20, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think anyone has the heart to post about how ruefully bad this movie was. Bloody Sacha 15:46, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

it already doesn't sound very good from the descripition of the plot.

the game sounds a little better but i highly doubt it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Homor (talk • contribs) 19:05, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The movie is OK regarding the standards. What is wanted by the new generations to be liked? --Manfariel (talk) 20:16, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Plot?

I saw this movie, and there was more in the plot than stated in the article.

Usually movie article plots are meant to be a summary. There is already to much in there I think. --< Nicht Nein! (talk) 07:07, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And the movie summaries on wikipedia have the ending...--Ssteiner209 (talk) 01:14, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I redid the summary so it fits within the 700 words per WP:FILMPLOT, but it can be condensed further if need be. -AngusWOOF (talk) 02:49, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Production company and distributor

User:Faster2010 is removing the sourced production company and distributor in the infobox. I have added the content along with a Variety source. I'm not going to edit war over this, but it makes no sense to delete something and not even have the courtesy to say why in your edit summary. Why do you think your unsourced additions are correct? Do you think readers should trust you over Variety? —Mike Allen 04:30, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Ironside

Would it be relevant to the article if mentioned that the "Tyler" of V (1983 miniseries) lends his voice to the "Tyler" of this movie? Was it intentional? --Manfariel (talk) 20:39, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]