Talk:Henry Ashby Turner

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

David Abraham Affair

Like it or not, within the academic world, Turner is known for the David Abraham affair, especially among scholars who do not specifically specialise in German history. One cannot gloss over or ignore this episode, and I would ask editors not to delete that section from the article. Poldy Bloom 06:28, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The David Abraham section of the article ignores the most notable feature of that affair: Henry A. Turner's use of privately circulated letters to discredit Abraham, which did not allow him the opportunity to respond. This was a large part of what made the episode controversial. It disturbed many historians (and not just "Marxists") because it looked like an established and powerful figure in the profession using private influence against someone just starting out, for personal reasons. Apart from the merits of the case, that ugly impression is the best-known aspect of Professor Turner's career (and will no doubt be included in his obituary); hence its notability from the Wikipedian standpoint. 152.160.39.70 (talk) 18:43, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Contrary to what 152.160.39.70 (at the University of Michigan) wrote about Professor Turner's obituary five month's before Turner's death, his various obituaries did not portray him as leading an underhanded smear-campaign against Abraham. Those obituaries that mentioned the Abraham affair did so in a dispassionate and accurate way. Poldy Bloom (talk) 23:40, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have condensed the two paragraphs on the Abraham affair (one preexisting and one added by 69.172.105.132) into one paragraph. I have also added several citations, including one to Gerald Feldman's article about the affair and one to the special issue of Radical History Review in which a line-up of Abraham's allies criticized Turner and Feldman. Editors of / contributors to this article need to beware of non-NPOV statements. This article should not become a venue for re-fighting the Abraham controversy of 25 years ago. Additionally, this article should not primarily be about the Abraham affair. That seems to have been only one aspect of Turner's career, and not the most significant from a scholarly perspective. Poldy Bloom (talk) 05:22, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Henry Ashby Turner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:57, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]