Talk:Henry Hübchen

This article was nominated for deletion on 29 March 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Here's the german wikipedia page [1]. It might have some leads for those wishing to improve this article, though it has absolutely no sources (kind of appalling if that's typical of the standards over there).Bali ultimate (talk) 16:53, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of sources -- from the International Herald Tribune, The New Yorker and The New York Times and then nominating for deletion as being insufficiently sourced is appaling behavior. Dont' remove those sources again.Bali ultimate (talk) 15:49, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mitteldeutscher Rundfunk reference

Rather that say "In an August 2004 profile, German public broadcaster Mitteldeutscher Rundfunk" (which is verbose, introduces what should be a reference into body text, and is insufficiently precise to make it easily verifiable) we should instead simply say "Hübchen is best known in Germany ..." and site as a footnote ref the specific details of the Mitteldeutscher Rundfunk program (the actual name of the program, and the specific date on which it was transmitted). 87.114.147.43 (talk) 21:45, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The "best known" had been contested earlier as "unsourced." I'm not fussed either way.Bali ultimate (talk) 21:46, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My point is not that it's unsourced, but that the source given isn't specific enough. 87.114.147.43 (talk) 21:49, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And my point was to A. explain why it was there and B. To tell you to change if you see fit (though i think you should then add in the nature of the source in the citation.) I don't much mind one way or the other.Bali ultimate (talk) 21:52, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

I noticed there was already an AfD done... but I still believe this is a minor minor actor and is an article largely made of bloat for notability in one film. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.95.57.23 (talk) 02:15, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is Wikipedia going to put a page up for every minor one-hit actor? Where's the notability factor here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.146.1.154 (talk) 06:44, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]