Jump to content

Talk:Herman Wold

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Importance (for Swedish project)

[edit]

Wold is rated of "low importance" for the Swedish project.

Wold should be Mid-importance, because of the depth of his results in multivariate statistics, time-series analysis, econometric statistics, and (econometric) mathematical economics. For the Swedish project, Wold may have been the most prominent economist in Swedish history, at least measured by the depth of his econometric statistics results. Wold's contributions to microeconomic theory (utility & demand theory, especially nonconvexities) and linear-systems are substantial. Wold's students, especially Whittle and Jöreskog, are among the most cited in economics (and the social sciences). Wold also was influential in Swedish universities for many decades, and his students also. Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk) 14:14, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Herman Wold. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:29, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]