Talk:Heron Tower

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Skyscrapers C‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Once again, some nobhead has deleted a perfectly fair and valid image. Wikipedia sucks. Wjfox2005 15:27, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What architectural style is this building? Post modern? Or something more specific? 79.78.114.247 (talk) 10:16, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How is a 202m building likely to "overtake" a 244m building? I've removed that rather ridiculous claim. Clarification - an enormous flagpole on the top does not contribute to the height of the building.

This page disagrees with itself regarding pinnacle height. 230m seems to be the correct figure, can anyone confirm? 81.129.122.211 (talk) 14:36, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality

I am placing an Advert template on the article because there are numerous sections which have been written like an advertisement, or in an overly positive manner. Here are the phrases which caught my eye:

Construction: "seemingly ahead of schedule", "rising at a rapid pace", "construction appeared to have accelerated", "'setback'" (with 'quotation marks')

Sustainability: "Sustainability is high on the design agenda"

Heron Plaza: "will form the centrepiece", "incorporating new public spaces and a network of squares and gardens"

The Heron: "Rather than offices, the slender 36-storey tower, called 'The Heron', will be a development of 284 luxury apartments right at the centre of the City of London", "The Heron's moody-looking anodised aluminium and steel facade should provide an interesting aesthetic contrast to the Barbican's concrete towers on the other side of Silk Street"

Does anyone disagree? Estesark (talk) 19:19, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't, but couldn't you have just edited it down? Pretty clear adverter-text! Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 18:22, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I could have, and possibly should have, but I don't like removing information about subjects I know nothing about... Thanks for doing it, anyway. Estesark (talk) 20:31, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article is outdated - says that "Heron Tower is due to open in the first quarter 2011". Q1 2011 is over in days, and from my viewpoint in a nearby building, it's not that close to being done. 27 April 2011. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.114.44.209 (talk) 14:51, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tallest in The City?

The box at the bottom ofv the articlec staes that it was replaced by the Shard as the tallest buliding in The City of London but the Shard is not in The City itself but in Southwark so I have changed the box accordingly Penrithguy (talk) 19:08, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Heron Tower. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:56, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Heron Tower. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:52, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Interactive Brokers reference

The reference to Interactive Brokers looks rather like an advert - does it need to be rephrased? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.237.235.144 (talk) 13:49, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]