Jump to content

Talk:Heterocrossa canescens

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Carposina canescens. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:07, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Current name for species

[edit]

It appears both from the Dugdale paper cited in the article and the New Zealand Organisms Register that the current accepted name for this species is Heterocrossa canescens (Walker, 1864). Unless other editors have an objection I propose editing this article to reflect this.Ambrosia10 (talk) 17:49, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 9 June 2018

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 05:02, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Carposina canescensHeterocrossa canescens – As explained in the updated article as well as in the above section Heterocrossa canescens is the currently accepted scientific name for this New Zealand moth species. Please refer to the references added to the article particularly those in the taxonomy section. Ambrosia10 (talk) 23:31, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support per NZOR record for this New Zealand endemic species. Plantdrew (talk) 03:59, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.