Talk:Hindu Aikya Vedi

This page was proposed for deletion by Winged Blades of Godric (talk · contribs) on 2 June 2019.

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Kerala (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in March 2012.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Hinduism Low‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

ANTI-HINDU PROPAGANDA IN WP

There are many pages captioned 'anti-Christian' in WP written by Indian Christians. They contain anti-India and anti-Hindu propaganda. NPOV editors are immediately blocked, if they try to edit the POV. It is all done as a gang-conspiracy by these treasonous Indian Christians [mostly Mallus] in collusion with a few POV Admins. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.68.96.200 (talk) 07:35, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, your own comment seems very similar to the rhetoric of the right wing fanatics who want to drag India back to stone age. The greatest treason in Indian history was the assassination of Gandhiji, carried out by a supporter of these fascists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.105.78.4 (talk) 10:47, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of neutrality

In my opinion, this article requires a fair bit of work to reduce its obviously heavily non-neutral content. For the most part, it currently appears to simply be a platform for espousing the groups perspective in a non-neutral fashion. This article badly needs some objective third party sources to substantiate it. thanks Deconstructhis (talk) 13:54, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 15:29, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

Hi User:Sitush I am highly tempted to AfD this so as to release it of its miseries. The only source has now 404ed. your thoughts. --DBig Xrayᗙ 12:21, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

ഹിന്ദു ഐക്യവേദി.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:23, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]