Talk:Hindu code bills

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

India Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hinduism: Philosophy

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
	This article is supported by the Philosophy task force.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ambedkar vs Nehru[edit]

Some sections of the article vilify Nehru and praise Ambedkar. Lots of biased opinions. Can someone update with what happened actually rather than blaming/praising someone? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shekure (talk • contribs) 08:24, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

JNU POV[edit]

What is the article by Anup Kumar JNU doing on the page? It is a vitriolic POV and does not adhere to any Wiki standard. Am deleting it--Puruvara (talk) 09:31, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bills vs. Secularism[edit]

The bills sought to outlaw specific Hindu practices instead of waiting for Hindus to reform their own religion, thereby contravening a fundamental tenet of Western nation-states, viz. separation of church and state. The bills also abandoned secularism by aiming to nullify or override religious practices by state action. The bills' aggressive timing reflected personal biases of Prime Minister Nehru, an atheist, and Law Minister Ambedkar, a Hindu convert to Buddhism and a longstanding and loud critic of Hinduism. Finally, the bills as a whole were called communal ^[1] because they targeted only certain religions, and ignorant because they were arbitrarily grouped together.

It was alleged that Nehru did not have the courage to target Muslims since he feared that it would lead to large-scale bloodshed nationwide. The charge was made by cabinet member Shyama Prasad Mukherji ^[2]who went on to found the Jan Sangh, which became the Bharatiya Janata Party over time through multiple re-organizations.

As a related observation, it is worth noting that state governments in India increasingly control the management of the main operating Hindu temples ^[3] (and only Hindu temples). Thus even today, India does not honor separation of church and state, and therefore is not secular, despite slogans to the contrary. Sooku (talk) 04:07, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References

[1] ttp://www.livemint.com/Opinion/h953KJCyrVIMah1Cp8OTwO/The-Nehruvian-condescension-towards-minorities.html

[2] ttp://archive.indianexpress.com/news/of-reform-and-resistance/453151/

[3] ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindu_temple#Temple_Management_and_erosion_of_Autonomy_by_control_of_states_and_Law

[1]

[2]

[3]