Talk:Hip bone

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
edit·history·watch·refresh Stock post message.svg To-do list for Hip bone:


Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Move[edit]

What do people think about moving this page to Hip bone, and redirecting this there for now? I think pelvis should have more pelvic cavity stuff, not be talking about the bone. Tristanb 07:49 10 Jun 2003 (UTC)

I personally would keep "Hip Bone" redirecting to this article as the term 'Hip Bone' is a rather lay term. I would also suggest that this article be renamed to the "Bony Pelvis" - a term which is generally accepted to refer to the bony structures of the pelvis.
Pelvis should then, as you say, discuss the contents of the true and false Pelvis with reference to the bony pelvis. 'Pelvis' to me does suggest a discussion combining both the bony and visceral pelvis. --Chris Scott 14:02, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Backwards test for female vs. male pelvis?[edit]

The article says:

If the angle is about the same as between your outstretched thumb and index finger, it is a female pelvis (arcus pubis). If it is closer to the angle between your spread index and middle fingers, it is a male pelvis (arcus subpubis).

This seems backwards to me. One would expect the female pelvic angle to be greater than the male angle; as the article saysw, the female pelvis is wider and shallower than the male. -- Dominus 21:04, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)

The angle in the female pelvis is indeed greater, and that's also what our article says: the angle between thumb and index finger is greater than the one between index finger and middle finger. Somebody should track down which parts of this article talk about humans and which parts talk about vertebrates in general. Right now everything is mixed up. AxelBoldt 04:09, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Wrong Picture Label[edit]

I think the picture label is wrong- it mislabels the ischium. It is inconsistent with the Gray's picture. 68.17.245.254 00:55, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

  • The commenter above is correct; It looks to me like the arrow might have been intended to point a part of one ischial spine that is showing through the pelvic opening. However, the arrow is off enough to put its head roughly where the ilium meets the pubis. Also, "acetabulum" is the correct spelling for the socket of the hip joint. User:136.165.37.245 18:29, 19 November 2006 — Preceding unsigned comment added by AwesomeCoffee (talkcontribs)

Asterisks[edit]

"The fusion is usually complete by age 25.***"

Did these asterisks originally attach to some sort of note? I looked but found no accompanying pair, should they be removed? Does anyone know what they may have originally indicated? AweCo (talk) 00:24, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Coxal.JPG Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

Image-x-generic.svg

An image used in this article, File:Coxal.JPG, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:19, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Flat or irregular?[edit]

The introduction says flat and the category says irregular. What is right? --Impériale (talk) 22:54, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hip bone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:39, 4 November 2017 (UTC)