Jump to content

Talk:Historical Archive of the City of Cologne

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Destruction of this archive

[edit]

I withdraw my previous comments. Budhen (talk) 11:56, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sandy Skelton, Brisbane Australia writes as follows ......... Latest Developments I have heard at the RMAA's (Records Management Association of Australasia) 2010 convention, Gold Coast, Australia in September, is as follows:

65,000 Records went down in the collapse It will take 30 years to restore the records with the resourcing available 5% of all holdings are permanently lost (over 3,000 records) 3 Million units have so far been salvaged but this does not mean they can be saved

Biggest losses are academic research, sound recordings, charters, photographs, manuscripts, bequests and architectural models. Nobel peace prize documents also damaged by water.

Records salvaged from the debris, are expected to be complete by 30 September 2010 - 1.5 years after initial collapse. Then the restoration can continue from there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.49.139.142 (talk) 01:35, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Update required

[edit]

This article is looking seriously out of date in terms of the rescue/conservation work on the holdings and reopening of the archive. If anyone could update it a bit from the German article it would be appreciated. GrindtXX (talk) 22:23, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done, could anybody with an english mother tongue check the text? --elya (talk) 16:07, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

alcalic cement

[edit]

Just a small point ... I was curious to know what "alcalic cement" is (mentioned in the "After the collapse" section), but I can't find any information anywhere. I suspect it may be a typo or mistranslation, but I'm not sure what for. It sounds a bit like "alkali" or something, but I would only be guessing. 86.160.216.41 (talk) 04:22, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm...I thought I'd do a quick change to "alkali" or "alkaline" as you suggested, but that's not what the citation is about at all -- it's about the cost, which isn't mentioned in the article. So I kept the ref but changed the sentence completely to match what third-party RSes are emphasizing. Thanks anon. IP! -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 16:19, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Historical Archive of the City of Cologne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:18, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Historical Archive of the City of Cologne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:49, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]