Talk:History of North Carolina

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Early history was almost incomprehensible. Someone put in Martin & Brandy or something like that...

the statement at the beginning of the article regarding the Roanoke colony is untrue...very few historians believe they starved to death and that is very unlikely considering the abundance of seafood and wildlife in the area..also it is not referenced..there has been considerable debate regarding their fate for a long time but I`ve never really heard anyone say they starved...see [ http://www.lost-colony.com ] Lonepilgrim007 (talk) 08:18, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I`m removing the statement..it simply isn`t true..it is possible they starved to death but it is not what most historians believe..most historians believe they were massacred by the Native Americans although there is little evidence for that either. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.242.102.242 (talk) 21:11, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
sick
that wase cool 96.78.79.69 (talk) 18:54, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

secession[edit]

North Carolina seceded May 20, 1861. Tennessee seceded June 8, 1861. So how is it that North Carolina was the "last" Confederate state to secede? Bms4880 (talk) 21:42, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Double article[edit]

It appears that this article is now two histories of North Carolina, a relatively short one with several subsections, and then a more detailed one. This is confusing. Normally an article would start with a summary, a one or two paragraph description of the overall shape of the article. The present summary (the first section) is too long to actually be a summary. Can the first paragraph serve as the overall summary for the article, and can the subsequent three or so subsections be merged into the rest of the article? It looks like there is a lot of repetition. --Ken Gallager (talk) 20:34, 17 November 2010 (UTC) We learnt the 5 theory's of the last colony and that we had a good conversation and argument — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.181.87.117 (talk) 00:48, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

again in the Roanoke section it states most historians say they starved and died of illness..maybe they did maybe they didn`t..it is not referenced and shouldn`t be in the article 72.242.102.242 (talk) 21:29, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of North Carolina[edit]

Any interest in creating a Timeline of North Carolina article? A few other US states have timelines (see Category:Timelines of states of the United States). Here are some sources:

  • "Timeline of North Carolina History". NCpedia. State Library of North Carolina.
  • D. K. Bennett (1858). Chronology of North Carolina. New York: James M. Edney.
  • Federal Writers’ Project (1939). "Chronology". North Carolina: A Guide to the Old North State. American Guide Series. p. 567+ – via Open Library. {{cite book}}: External link in |chapterurl= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help)

-- M2545 (talk) 16:17, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on History of North Carolina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:32, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of North Carolina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:21, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of North Carolina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:30, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of North Carolina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:35, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:History_of_North_Carolina&oldid=1217423107"